GT 6 vs Google Pixel 9a

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Realme · 2023

GT 6

$380

83.6/ 100

Overall

Exceptional

BeastScore

83.6

Benchmark

Performance95/100

Camera84/100

Battery92/100

Google · 2025

Google Pixel 9a

$499

83.7/ 100

Overall

Exceptional

BeastScore

83.7

Benchmark

Performance80/100

Camera82/100

Battery86/100

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy GT 6:

✓$119 lower launch MSRP ($380 vs $499)
✓Larger 5,500 mAh battery capacity (+400 mAh more capacity)
✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

Reasons to buy Google Pixel 9a:

✓5g lighter chassis (186g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓48MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓6.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	GT 6	Google Pixel 9a
1. Display & Screen
Screen Type & Tech	AMOLED / OLED display	OLED
Screen Size	6.78"	6.3"
Resolution & Density	N/A	2424x1080 (422 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz	120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness	N/A	2,700 nits peak
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	16 GB	8 GB
Internal Storage	128GB / 256GB / 512GB	128GB / 256GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera	50 MP	48 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung GN3
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	32 MP	13 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions	N/A	154.7 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm
Weight	191 g	186 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	IP68
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity	5,500 mAh	5,100 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	23W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging	Not supported	7W wireless charging
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3+	5.3
USB Port & Speed	USB Type-C	USB-C 3.2
NFC	Yes	Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	$380	$499

Editorial Lab Verdict

Google Pixel 9a edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.7/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel 9a ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 82/100 camera rating.

When to buy GT 6:

Larger battery capacity: 5,500 mAh (+400 mAh more) · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB

When to buy Google Pixel 9a:

Higher overall BeastScore: 83.7 vs top rival 83.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 23W vs max 0W

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: GT 6 vs Google Pixel 9a

Which phone is better: GT 6 or Google Pixel 9a?

Google Pixel 9a leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.7/100 compared to GT 6 (83.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.7 vs top rival 83.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 23W vs max 0W.