BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/GT 7 vs POCO F6
Lab Benchmark Battle

GT 7 vs POCO F6

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Realme · 2024

GT 7

GT 7
81/ 100
Launch MSRP$440 USD
Xiaomi · 2024

POCO F6

POCO F6
88/ 100
Launch MSRP$449 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS POCO F6 BETTER THAN GT 7?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

GT 7
POCO F6Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGT 7POCO F6LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,200 mAh5,000 mAh+5,200 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard90W90W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.8"6.67"6.8"
Chassis Weight199g179g179g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy GT 7:
  • ✓$9 lower launch MSRP ($440 vs $449)
  • ✓Larger 5,200 mAh battery capacity (+200 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy POCO F6:
  • ✓20g lighter chassis (179g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGT 7POCO F6
1. Display & Screen🏆 POCO F6 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLED / OLED displayAMOLED
Screen Size6.8"6.67"
Resolution & DensityN/A 2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A2,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 GT 7 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 POCO F6 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, Sony LYT-600
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A8 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP20 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 POCO F6 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A160.5 x 74 x 8 mm
Weight199 g179 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedIP64
8. Battery & Charging🏆 POCO F6 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,200 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A90W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$440$449
Editorial Lab Verdict

POCO F6 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 87.7/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, POCO F6 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose GT 7:
Larger battery capacity: 5,200 mAh (+200 mAh more)
When to choose POCO F6:
Higher overall BeastScore: 87.7 vs top rival 81.1 · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: GT 7 vs POCO F6

Which is better: GT 7 or POCO F6?

POCO F6 leads with an overall BeastScore of 87.7/100 compared to GT 7 (81.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 87.7 vs top rival 81.1 and Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between GT 7 and POCO F6?

GT 7 is equipped with a 6.8-inch display and 5200 mAh battery, while POCO F6 features a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between GT 7 and POCO F6?

In objective hardware benchmarks, GT 7 achieves a 90/100 performance score, while POCO F6 scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →