Honor 300 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro wins 4 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedHonor 300 Ultra9590
- CameraMotorola Edge 50 Pro8091
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryHonor 300 Ultra8682
- DisplayMotorola Edge 50 Pro8994
- ConnectivityMotorola Edge 50 Pro6590
- SecurityMotorola Edge 50 Pro57100
- ValueHonor 300 Ultra8580
- Honor 300 Ultra has the bigger battery5,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro charges faster125W vs 100W
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Honor 300 Ultra has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.67"
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro is lighter186 g vs 198 g
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
- Honor 300 Ultra has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Honor 300 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP65
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Edge 50 Pro wins — BeastScore 88.5/100
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (125W vs 100W) and smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The Honor 300 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh).
Larger battery: 5,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh · More RAM: 16 GB vs 12 GB
Faster wired charging: 125W vs 100W · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)
Common questions
Which is better: Honor 300 Ultra or Motorola Edge 50 Pro?
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (125W vs 100W) and smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The Honor 300 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh). BeastScore: Honor 300 Ultra 87.5/100, Motorola Edge 50 Pro 88.5/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Honor 300 Ultra and Motorola Edge 50 Pro?
Honor 300 Ultra has a 6.78-inch display and 5300 mAh battery. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do Honor 300 Ultra and Motorola Edge 50 Pro compare for speed?
Honor 300 Ultra scores 95/100 for performance; Motorola Edge 50 Pro scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Honor 300 Ultra vs Honor 300 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
vivo V30 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs OnePlus 12R
Honor 300 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Gear for the Motorola Edge 50 Pro
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →





