HONOR Magic4 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
HONOR Magic4 Pro
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 2 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9090
- CameraTie8888
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6088
- BatteryHONOR Magic4 Pro8270
- DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra86100
- ConnectivityTie8383
- SecurityHONOR Magic4 Pro10014
- ValueTie5555
- HONOR Magic4 Pro has the bigger battery4,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- HONOR Magic4 Pro charges faster100W vs 45W
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.81"
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 209 g
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- HONOR Magic4 Pro is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.6 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+600 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 100W vs max 45W
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.6 · Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz
Common questions
Which is better: HONOR Magic4 Pro or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to HONOR Magic4 Pro (83.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.6 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between HONOR Magic4 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
HONOR Magic4 Pro has a 6.81-inch display and 4600 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.
How do HONOR Magic4 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra compare for speed?
HONOR Magic4 Pro scores 90/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
HONOR Magic4 Pro vs Magic6 Pro
HONOR Magic4 Pro vs HONOR Magic5 Pro
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
HONOR Magic4 Pro vs Galaxy S26
Related articles
All articles →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →