Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Max 5G: Which One Should You Buy?
These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Too close to call: 0 of 5 categories each
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9595
- CameraTie8080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie9595
- DisplayTie8989
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie8585
- Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G has the bigger battery8,300 mAh vs 8,000 mAh
- Xiaomi 17 Max 5G has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.79"
- Xiaomi 17 Max 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Xiaomi 17 Max 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G and Xiaomi 17 Max 5G are evenly matched
It's a close call. Pick the Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G for its bigger battery (8,300 mAh vs 8,000 mAh), or the Xiaomi 17 Max 5G for its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.79") and more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Larger battery: 8,300 mAh vs 8,000 mAh
More RAM: 16 GB vs 12 GB
Common questions
Which is better: Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G or Xiaomi 17 Max 5G?
It's a close call. Pick the Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G for its bigger battery (8,300 mAh vs 8,000 mAh), or the Xiaomi 17 Max 5G for its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.79") and more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB). BeastScore: Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G 89.3/100, Xiaomi 17 Max 5G 89.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G and Xiaomi 17 Max 5G?
Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G has a 6.79-inch display and 8300 mAh battery. Xiaomi 17 Max 5G has a 6.9-inch display and 8000 mAh battery.
How do Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G and Xiaomi 17 Max 5G compare for speed?
Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi 17 Max 5G scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G vs Honor X70 Pro Max 5G
Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G vs Honor X70i 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) vs Xiaomi 17 Max 5G
Xiaomi 17 vs Xiaomi 17 Max 5G
Xiaomi 17T 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Max 5G
Xiaomi 17 Max 5G vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 Max 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Max 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Gear for the Honor X70 Refresh Edition 5G
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →





