Home/Battles/HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Lab Benchmark Battle
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Htc · 2024
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U)Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | HTC U24 | Samsung SM-F966B/DS | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +4,600 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.8" | 6.49" | 6.8" |
| Chassis Weight | 198.7g | 215g | 198.7g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U):
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+200 mAh more)
When to buy Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7):
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Which phone is better: HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) or Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+200 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) and Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) is equipped with a 6.8-inch display and 4600 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) and Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
In lab hardware evaluations, HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Score: 72/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2023
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Score: 72/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
Score: 72/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo S17 Pro 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2284A (BBK V2284A)
Score: 72/100
Oppo · 2023
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Score: 72/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #172 vs 72
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #272 vs 72
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #372 vs 70
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #472 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #572 vs 72
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #672 vs 72
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #772 vs 73
HTC U24 Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 512GB (HTC Eno U) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #872 vs 73
Samsung SM-F966B/DS Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S