iPhone 16 vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
iPhone 16
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)8095
- CameraiPhone 168260
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)5870
- DisplayiPhone 166462
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has the bigger battery4,400 mAh vs 3,561 mAh
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has the bigger screen6.49" vs 6.1"
- iPhone 16 is lighter170 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Apple A18
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) wins — BeastScore 72.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.0 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+839 mAh more).
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 48 MP vs max 0 MP
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.0 vs top rival 71.7 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+839 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: iPhone 16 or Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.0/100 compared to iPhone 16 (71.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.0 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+839 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between iPhone 16 and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
iPhone 16 has a 6.1-inch display and 3561 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do iPhone 16 and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
iPhone 16 scores 80/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 15 Plus
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)
Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 17
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 15 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 16e
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Related articles
All articles →
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
Read →
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
Read →
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
Read →