iPhone X vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS iPhone X BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | iPhone X | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 2,716 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +2,716 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 18W | Standard | 25W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5.85" | 3.8" | 5.85" |
| Chassis Weight | 174g | 160g | 160g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄iPhone X edges ahead with a BeastScore of 63.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, iPhone X ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 75/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: iPhone X vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which phone is better: iPhone X or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
iPhone X leads with an overall BeastScore of 63.2/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 63.2 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 2,716 mAh (+766 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between iPhone X and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
iPhone X is equipped with a 5.85-inch display and 2716 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between iPhone X and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In lab hardware evaluations, iPhone X scores 75/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
iPhone X vs Galaxy Folder2


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2


iPhone X vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


iPhone X vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

iPhone X vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

