iQOO Neo 11 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin): Which One Should You Buy?
iQOO Neo 11 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 91.7/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
iQOO Neo 11
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
iQOO Neo 11 wins 6 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeediQOO Neo 119080
- CameraiQOO Neo 118860
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)6076
- BatteryiQOO Neo 1110096
- DisplayiQOO Neo 119662
- ConnectivityiQOO Neo 119568
- SecurityTie100100
- ValueiQOO Neo 118068
- iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery7,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- iQOO Neo 11 charges faster100W vs 90W
- iQOO Neo 11 has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger screen6.82" vs 6.67"
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is lighter198 g vs 217 g
- iQOO Neo 11 launched cheaper$365 vs $379
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a sharper selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP
- iQOO Neo 11 has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- iQOO Neo 11 has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 8400
- iQOO Neo 11 has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄iQOO Neo 11 wins — BeastScore 91.7/100
After comparing all the specs, iQOO Neo 11 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 91.7 vs top rival 73.4 and Larger battery capacity: 7,500 mAh (+1,500 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 91.7 vs top rival 73.4 · Larger battery capacity: 7,500 mAh (+1,500 mAh more)
Lighter body: 198g (19g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: iQOO Neo 11 or Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
iQOO Neo 11 leads with an overall BeastScore of 91.7/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) (73.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 91.7 vs top rival 73.4 and Larger battery capacity: 7,500 mAh (+1,500 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between iQOO Neo 11 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
iQOO Neo 11 has a 6.82-inch display and 7500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do iQOO Neo 11 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) compare for speed?
iQOO Neo 11 scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
iQOO Neo 11 vs POCO X6 Pro
iQOO Neo 11 vs Galaxy A36
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 5G
POCO X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
POCO X6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Xiaomi Poco X7 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 24095PCADI (Xiaomi Malachite C) vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Galaxy A37 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →