Home/Battles/Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Lab Benchmark Battle

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Xiaomi · 2014

Mi Pad 7.9

68/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

68/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Mi Pad 7.9 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Mi Pad 7.9Winner 🏆

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Mi Pad	Samsung SM-F761B	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	6,700 mAh	4,000 mAh	+6,700 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	8 MP	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	7.9"	6.7"	7.9"
Chassis Weight	360g	187g	187g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Mi Pad 7.9:

✓Larger 6,700 mAh battery capacity (+2,700 mAh more capacity)
✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓7.9" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

Reasons to buy Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R):

✓173g lighter chassis (187g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Mi Pad 7.9	Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Mi Pad 7.9 Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors	AM-OLED display
Screen Size	7.9"	6.7"
Resolution & Density	1536x2048 (324 ppi)	1080x2640 (425 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	2 GB LPDDR	8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	2GB / 64GB	128GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Mi Pad 7.9 Wins Camera
Primary Camera	8 MP	N/A
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	5 MP	N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	360 g	187 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Mi Pad 7.9 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	6,700 mAh	4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	microUSB 2.0, USB Host	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Mi Pad 7.9 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 68.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Mi Pad 7.9 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy Mi Pad 7.9:

Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.2 · Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,700 mAh more)

When to buy Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R):

More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 2GB · Lighter body: 187g (173g lighter in hand)

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Which phone is better: Mi Pad 7.9 or Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?

Mi Pad 7.9 leads with an overall BeastScore of 68.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) (68.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,700 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Mi Pad 7.9 and Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?

Mi Pad 7.9 is equipped with a 7.9-inch display and 6700 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) features a 6.7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between Mi Pad 7.9 and Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?

In lab hardware evaluations, Mi Pad 7.9 scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung · 2026

Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

Score: 69/100

Apple · 2025

Xiaomi Mi 12 Lite 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2203129G (Xiaomi Taoyao)

Score: 68/100

Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Score: 69/100

Oppo · 2022

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

Score: 68/100

Motorola · 2025

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Score: 90/100

Trending Matchups

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

Battle #168 vs 69

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

Mi Pad 7.9

V/S

Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #268 vs 69

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

V/S

Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #368 vs 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)

Mi Pad 7.9

V/S

Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #468 vs 68

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

V/S

Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #568 vs 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Mi Pad 7.9

V/S

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #668 vs 68

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

V/S

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #768 vs 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Mi Pad 7.9

V/S

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #868 vs 68

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

V/S

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Compare Both Phones→