Home/Battles/MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Lab Benchmark Battle
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Mitac · 2004
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2016
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-WalkerWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | MiTAC Mio | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 750 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +1,950 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 2.2" | 3.8" | 3.8" |
| Chassis Weight | 125g | 160g | 125g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker:
Lighter body: 125g (35g lighter in hand)
When to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):
Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+1,200 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 3.8" vs max 2.2" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which phone is better: MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Lighter body: 125g (35g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker is equipped with a 2.2-inch display and 750 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In lab hardware evaluations, MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2017
Galaxy Folder2
Score: 61/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Score: 66/100
Google · 2022
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Score: 66/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Score: 67/100
Xiaomi · 2014
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Score: 61/100
Vivo · 2015
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Score: 61/100
Oppo · 2016
Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Score: 61/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #161 vs 61
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Galaxy Folder2
V/S
Battle #261 vs 61
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2
V/S
Battle #361 vs 66
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #461 vs 66
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #561 vs 66
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #661 vs 66
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #761 vs 67
MiTAC Mio 8390 Digi-Walker vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S
Battle #861 vs 67
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S