Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs vivo X100: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro wins 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9090
- CameraTie9191
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Edge 50 Pro10088
- Batteryvivo X1008290
- DisplayMotorola Edge 50 Pro9490
- ConnectivityMotorola Edge 50 Pro8883
- SecurityTie100100
- ValueMotorola Edge 50 Pro8068
- vivo X100 has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro charges faster125W vs 120W
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- vivo X100 has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.67"
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro is lighter186 g vs 202 g
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro launched cheaper$549 vs $699
- Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP
- vivo X100 has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- vivo X100 has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Edge 50 Pro wins — BeastScore 88.5/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 88.5 vs top rival 88.0 and Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
Higher overall BeastScore: 88.5 vs top rival 88.0 · Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz
Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more) · Brighter screen: 3,000 nits peak vs 2,000 nits
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Edge 50 Pro or vivo X100?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 88.5/100 compared to vivo X100 (88.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 88.5 vs top rival 88.0 and Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Edge 50 Pro and vivo X100?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. vivo X100 has a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Edge 50 Pro and vivo X100 compare for speed?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro scores 90/100 for performance; vivo X100 scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
vivo V30 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs OnePlus 12R
vivo X100 vs Vivo X300
vivo X100 vs vivo X200
Related articles
All articles →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →





