Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G vs vivo X Fold3 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo X Fold3 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo X Fold3 Pro

vivo X Fold3 Pro
89/ 100
Launch price$1,499
Head-to-head

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G
0 wins
vivo X Fold3 Pro
vivo X Fold3 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplay
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5Gvivo X Fold3 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • Speedfrom specsvivo X Fold3 Pro
    72
    94
  • Camerafrom specsTie
    82
    82
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • Batteryfrom specsvivo X Fold3 Pro
    73
    90
  • Displayfrom specsTie
    88
    88
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery5,700 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger screen8.03" vs 6.8"
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.8" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X Fold3 Pro
  • ✓763 g lighter (236 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$8500 cheaper at launch ($1499 vs $9999)
  • ✓Bigger 5,700 mAh battery (+500 mAh)

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5Gvivo X Fold3 Pro
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeNot listedLTPO AMOLED (foldable)
Screen Size6.8"8.03"
Resolution & DensityN/A FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (403 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo X Fold3 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 7s Gen 4 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15 Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB1024 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera50 MP, 50MP Main (OIS) + 50MP Ultra-wide + Telephoto50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-808
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)64 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.6, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP32 MP, f/2.5
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A159.3 x 142.4 x 5.2 mm
WeightN/A236 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIPX8
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo X Fold3 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,200 mAh5,700 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1499
Our verdict

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo X Fold3 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,700 mAh (+500 mAh more).

Buy Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G if you want

Balanced specifications with Motorola hardware design · Runs Android 15 with optimized security support

Buy vivo X Fold3 Pro if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.0 · Larger battery capacity: 5,700 mAh (+500 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G or vivo X Fold3 Pro?

vivo X Fold3 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G (89.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,700 mAh (+500 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G and vivo X Fold3 Pro?

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ 5G has a 6.8-inch display and 5200 mAh battery. vivo X Fold3 Pro has a 8.03-inch display and 5700 mAh battery.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Motorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone DuoTeaser
4 min read

Motorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo

Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →