BeastCompare

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Open: Which One Should You Buy?

Open edges ahead with a BeastScore of 76.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Oneplus · 2024

Open

Open
77/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

Open wins 3 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
1 win
Open
Open
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayValue
Motorola Razr 40 UltraOpen
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedOpen
    80
    95
  • CameraOpen
    72
    78
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • BatteryOpen
    58
    78
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    96
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    55
    55
Key differences
  • Open has the bigger battery4,800 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Open has a sharper main camera48 MP vs 12 MP
  • Open has the bigger screen7.8" vs 6.9"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 238 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra launched cheaper$999 vs $1,099
  • Open has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Open has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓53.5 g lighter (184.5 g vs 238 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$100 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $1,099)
  • ✓12 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Open
  • ✓Bigger 4,800 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓48 MP main camera
  • ✓7.8" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 40 UltraOpen
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDNot listed
Screen Size6.9"7.8"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)N/A
Refresh Rate165 HzNot listed
Brightness1,400 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Open Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 730Adreno 740
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Open Wins Camera
Primary Camera12 MP, f/1.7, OIS48 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.432 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mmN/A
Weight184.5 g238 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP52Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Open Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,800 mAh4,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging30W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless Charging5W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6ENot listed
Bluetooth5.3Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$999$1,099
Our verdict

Open wins — BeastScore 76.8/100

The Open is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,800 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (48 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (184.5 g vs 238 g).

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Lighter: 184.5 g vs 238 g (54 g less) · Lower launch price: $999 vs $1,099

Buy Open if you want

Larger battery: 4,800 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 48 MP vs 12 MP

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Open?

The Open is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,800 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (48 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (184.5 g vs 238 g). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100, Open 76.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Open?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Open has a 7.8-inch display and 4800 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Open compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Open scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB
Samsung

SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB

iPhone 17
Apple

iPhone 17

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)
Google

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)

V27
Vivo

V27

OPPO F35 Pro
Oppo

OPPO F35 Pro

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

vivo X Fold3 Pro vs Open

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

Open vs SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Open vs iPhone 17

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

Compare →

Gear for the Open

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →