Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Pixel 6a: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins overall; Pixel 6a takes 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8072
- CameraTie7272
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8840
- BatteryPixel 6a5870
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9662
- ConnectivityPixel 6a7583
- SecurityPixel 6a3486
- ValuePixel 6a5580
- Pixel 6a has the bigger battery4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra charges faster30W vs 18W
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.1"
- Pixel 6a is lighter178 g vs 184.5 g
- Pixel 6a launched cheaper$449 vs $999
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
- Pixel 6a is better protected from water and dustIP67 vs IP52
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 18W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Pixel 6a is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh).
Faster wired charging: 30W vs 18W · Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
Larger battery: 4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Lower launch price: $449 vs $999
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Pixel 6a?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 18W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Pixel 6a is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100, Pixel 6a 70.4/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Pixel 6a?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Pixel 6a has a 6.1-inch display and 4410 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Pixel 6a compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Pixel 6a scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Pixel 6a vs Pixel 8a
Pixel 6a vs Pixel 7a
Pixel 5a vs Pixel 6a
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Pixel 6a vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Gear for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →