Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Pixel 6a: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Google · 2022

Pixel 6a

Pixel 6a
70/ 100
Launch price$449
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins overall; Pixel 6a takes 4 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3 wins
Pixel 6a
Pixel 6a
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Motorola Razr 40 UltraPixel 6a
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    80
    72
  • CameraTie
    72
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    88
    40
  • BatteryPixel 6a
    58
    70
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    96
    62
  • ConnectivityPixel 6a
    75
    83
  • SecurityPixel 6a
    34
    86
  • ValuePixel 6a
    55
    80
Key differences
  • Pixel 6a has the bigger battery4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra charges faster30W vs 18W
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.1"
  • Pixel 6a is lighter178 g vs 184.5 g
  • Pixel 6a launched cheaper$449 vs $999
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Pixel 6a is better protected from water and dustIP67 vs IP52
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy Pixel 6a
  • ✓6.5 g lighter (178 g vs 184.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$550 cheaper at launch ($449 vs $999)
  • ✓Bigger 4,410 mAh battery (+610 mAh)

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 40 UltraPixel 6a
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.1"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)2400x1080 (429 ppi)
Refresh Rate165 Hz60 Hz
Brightness1,400 nits peak800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Google Tensor (5nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 730Mali-G78 MP20
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera12 MP, f/1.7, OIS12 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony IMX363
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.212 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.48 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Pixel 6a Lightest Chassis
Dimensions170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm
Weight184.5 g178 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP52IP67
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Pixel 6a Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,800 mAh4,410 mAh
Wired Fast Charging30W wired fast charging18W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging5W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.2
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$999$449
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 18W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Pixel 6a is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh).

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Faster wired charging: 30W vs 18W · Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz

Buy Pixel 6a if you want

Larger battery: 4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Lower launch price: $449 vs $999

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Pixel 6a?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 18W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Pixel 6a is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,410 mAh vs 3,800 mAh). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100, Pixel 6a 70.4/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Pixel 6a?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Pixel 6a has a 6.1-inch display and 4410 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Pixel 6a compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Pixel 6a scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →