Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE wins 3 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE7284
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8876
- BatteryXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE5870
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9674
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7570
- SecurityTie3434
- ValueXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE5580
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has the bigger battery4,250 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE charges faster33W vs 30W
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 12 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.55"
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is lighter158 g vs 184.5 g
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE launched cheaper$399 vs $999
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is better protected from water and dustIP53 vs IP52
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE wins — BeastScore 77.8/100
The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,250 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and faster charging (33W vs 30W). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 90 Hz).
Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 90 Hz · Brighter screen: 1,400 nits vs 800 nits
Larger battery: 4,250 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 64 MP vs 12 MP
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,250 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and faster charging (33W vs 30W). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 90 Hz). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100, Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 77.8/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a 6.55-inch display and 4250 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs Galaxy A16 5G
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs iPhone Air
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs Pixel 7a
Gear for the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARKElgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)
An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.
Read →





