Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs OnePlus Nord CE3: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
OnePlus · 2023

OnePlus Nord CE3

OnePlus Nord CE3
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
OnePlus Nord CE3
OnePlus Nord CE3
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Motorola Razr 50 UltraOnePlus Nord CE3
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    90
    86
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOnePlus Nord CE3
    70
    86
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    100
    89
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOnePlus Nord CE3
    55
    85
Key differences
  • OnePlus Nord CE3 has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.7"
  • OnePlus Nord CE3 is lighter179 g vs 189 g
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy OnePlus Nord CE3
  • ✓10 g lighter (179 g vs 189 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 50 UltraOnePlus Nord CE3
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.7"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz
Brightness3,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 782G
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700Cundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.4undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 OnePlus Nord CE3 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mmN/A
Weight189 g179 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP48Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 OnePlus Nord CE3 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.4Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,099Price on request
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.7"). The OnePlus Nord CE3 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz

Buy OnePlus Nord CE3 if you want

Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Lighter: 179 g vs 189 g (10 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or OnePlus Nord CE3?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.7"). The OnePlus Nord CE3 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100, OnePlus Nord CE3 84.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and OnePlus Nord CE3?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. OnePlus Nord CE3 has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and OnePlus Nord CE3 compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; OnePlus Nord CE3 scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →