Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Google · 2024

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
84/ 100
Launch price$1,799
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 3 of 7 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Motorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold
    90
    95
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    88
    85
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    88
    40
  • BatteryGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold
    70
    78
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    100
    90
  • ConnectivityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold
    83
    95
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    55
    55
Key differences
  • Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has the bigger battery4,650 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper main camera50 MP vs 48 MP
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has the bigger screen8" vs 6.9"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 257 g
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra launched cheaper$1,099 vs $1,799
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
  • Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Google Tensor G4
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓68 g lighter (189 g vs 257 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$700 cheaper at launch ($1,099 vs $1,799)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • ✓Bigger 4,650 mAh battery (+650 mAh)
  • ✓48 MP main camera
  • ✓8" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDOLED
Screen Size6.9"8"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)2076x2152 (380 ppi)
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz
Brightness3,000 nits peak2,700 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Google Tensor G4 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Mali-G715 MP7
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C48 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung GN3
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)10.5 MP (5x optical zoom), f/2.8, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2.210.5 MP, f/1.95
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.410 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm155.2 x 150.2 x 10.5 mm
Weight189 g257 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP48IPX8
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,000 mAh4,650 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging45W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless charging21W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,099$1,799
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra for its sharper main camera (50 MP vs 48 MP) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz), or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold for its bigger battery (4,650 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and bigger screen (8" vs 6.9").

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · Brighter screen: 3,000 nits vs 2,700 nits

Buy Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want

Larger battery: 4,650 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

It's a close call. Pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra for its sharper main camera (50 MP vs 48 MP) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz), or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold for its bigger battery (4,650 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and bigger screen (8" vs 6.9"). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100, Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 84.1/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a 8-inch display and 4650 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →