BeastCompare

Motorola Razr (2019) vs Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr (2019) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 64.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2020

Motorola Razr (2019)

Motorola Razr (2019)
65/ 100
Launch price$1,500
Samsung · 2015

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
61/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr (2019) wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr (2019)
Motorola Razr (2019)
2 wins
Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Motorola Razr (2019)Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr (2019)
    72
    60
  • CameraMotorola Razr (2019)
    68
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    58
    58
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueSamsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
    55
    68
Key differences
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger battery2,510 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger screen6.2" vs 3.8"
  • Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE is lighter155 g vs 205 g
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has more RAM6 GB vs 2 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr (2019)
  • ✓Bigger 2,510 mAh battery (+710 mAh)
  • ✓16 MP main camera
  • ✓6.2" display at 60 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
  • ✓50 g lighter (155 g vs 205 g), easier to hold
  • ✓3.8" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr (2019)Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeP-OLED (foldable)Color TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size6.2"3.8"
Resolution & Density2142x876 (373 ppi)480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 HzNot listed
Brightness450 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr (2019) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 9Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB8GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr (2019) Wins Camera
Primary Camera16 MP, f/1.7N/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)Not listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens5 MP, f/2N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE Lightest Chassis
Dimensions172 x 72 x 6.9 mmN/A
Weight205 g155 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity2,510 mAh1,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging15W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 5Not listed
Bluetooth5.0Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,500Price on request
Our verdict

Motorola Razr (2019) wins — BeastScore 64.5/100

The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 1,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.2" vs 3.8"). The Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (155 g vs 205 g).

Buy Motorola Razr (2019) if you want

Larger battery: 2,510 mAh vs 1,800 mAh · Larger display: 6.2" vs 3.8"

Buy Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE if you want

Lighter: 155 g vs 205 g (50 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr (2019) or Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE?

The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 1,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.2" vs 3.8"). The Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (155 g vs 205 g). BeastScore: Motorola Razr (2019) 64.5/100, Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE 60.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr (2019) and Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE?

Motorola Razr (2019) has a 6.2-inch display and 2510 mAh battery. Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE has a 3.8-inch display and 1800 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr (2019) and Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE compare for speed?

Motorola Razr (2019) scores 72/100 for performance; Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE scores 60/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S9
Samsung

Galaxy S9

iPhone 13
Apple

iPhone 13

Pixel 3
Google

Pixel 3

OnePlus One
Oneplus

OnePlus One

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)
Oppo

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs Galaxy S9

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE vs Galaxy Folder2

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs iPhone 13

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE vs iPhone 6

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs Pixel 3

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE vs Pixel

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs OnePlus One

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NL Galaxy Folder LTE vs OnePlus One

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr (2019)

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: The Definitive Flagship Compact Smartphone Architecture, 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO Super Actua & ProMotion Displays, Apple A18 Pro vs. Google Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Silicon, 5x Periscope Telephoto Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, On-Device Gemini Nano & Apple Intelligence, and Real-World Battery Showdown (2026)2026 COMPACT FLAGSHIP BENCHMARKS
15 min read

Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: The Definitive Flagship Compact Smartphone Architecture, 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO Super Actua & ProMotion Displays, Apple A18 Pro vs. Google Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Silicon, 5x Periscope Telephoto Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, On-Device Gemini Nano & Apple Intelligence, and Real-World Battery Showdown (2026)

A comprehensive 2,500+ word engineering analysis, thermal dissipation benchmark, camera sensor breakdown, and battery endurance comparison of the premier 6.2-to-6.3-inch pro smartphones.

Read →