Home/Battles/N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Lab Benchmark Battle
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Blu · 2019
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE
64/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) BETTER THAN N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)Winner 🏆
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | N0030WW BOLD | Samsung SM-G766N | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,500 mAh | 4,350 mAh | +4,350 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 18W | Standard | 25W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 15.9 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.4" | 6.58" | 6.58" |
| Chassis Weight | 180g | 240g | 180g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE:
Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 15.9 MP vs max 0 MP
When to buy Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 63.8 · Larger battery capacity: 4,350 mAh (+850 mAh more)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Which phone is better: N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE (63.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 63.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,350 mAh (+850 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE is equipped with a 6.4-inch display and 3500 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) features a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
In lab hardware evaluations, N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2022
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Score: 66/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Score: 66/100
Google · 2022
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Score: 66/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Score: 67/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Score: 66/100
Vivo · 2022
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Score: 66/100
Oppo · 2022
A17k
Score: 66/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #164 vs 66
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
V/S
Battle #266 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
V/S
Battle #364 vs 66
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #466 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #564 vs 66
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #666 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #764 vs 67
N0030WW BOLD N1 Dual SIM LTE vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S
Battle #866 vs 67
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S