BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs POCO X7 Pro
Lab Benchmark Battle

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs POCO X7 Pro

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Nothing

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
89/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Poco ยท 2025

POCO X7 Pro

POCO X7 Pro
88/ 100
Launch MSRP$379 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Nothing Phone (2a) Plus BETTER THAN POCO X7 Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Nothing Phone (2a) PlusWinner ๐Ÿ†
POCO X7 Pro

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORNothing PhonePOCO X7LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh+6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard90W90W Max
Main Camera SensorN/A50 MP50 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A6.67"6.67"
Chassis WeightN/A195g195g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy Nothing Phone (2a) Plus:

Comprehensive flagship hardware with verified benchmark scores.

Reasons to buy POCO X7 Pro:
  • โœ“804g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“$9620 lower launch MSRP ($379 vs $9999)
  • โœ“Larger 6,000 mAh battery capacity (+1,000 mAh more capacity)

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
SpecificationNothing Phone (2a) PlusPOCO X7 Pro
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† POCO X7 Pro Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLED / OLED displayAMOLED
Screen SizeN/A6.67"
Resolution & DensityN/A 2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A3,200 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemNothing OS 3.0 (Android 15) Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM MemoryN/A8 GB LPDDR
Internal StorageN/A256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† POCO X7 Pro Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A50 MP, f/1.5, OIS, Light Fusion 800
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A8 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A20 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† POCO X7 Pro Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A160.8 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm
WeightN/A195 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedIP68
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† POCO X7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A90W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on request$379
Editorial Lab Verdict

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Nothing Phone (2a) Plus ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Nothing Phone (2a) Plus:
Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 87.6
When to choose POCO X7 Pro:
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more) ยท Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs POCO X7 Pro

Which is better: Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or POCO X7 Pro?

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.0/100 compared to POCO X7 Pro (87.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 87.6.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and POCO X7 Pro?

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is equipped with a display and 5000 mAh battery, while POCO X7 Pro features a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and POCO X7 Pro?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Nothing Phone (2a) Plus achieves a 85/100 performance score, while POCO X7 Pro scores 80/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis โ†’
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis โ†’