Nothing Phone (3a) vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin): Which One Should You Buy?
Nothing Phone (3a) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Nothing Phone (3a)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Nothing Phone (3a) wins 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraNothing Phone (3a)9160
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNothing Phone (3a)8876
- BatteryXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)8696
- DisplayNothing Phone (3a)9062
- ConnectivityTie6868
- SecurityXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)34100
- ValueNothing Phone (3a)8068
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) charges faster90W vs 50W
- Nothing Phone (3a) has the bigger screen6.77" vs 6.67"
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is lighter198 g vs 201 g
- Nothing Phone (3a) has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the faster chipDimensity 8400 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP64
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Nothing Phone (3a) wins — BeastScore 86.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Nothing Phone (3a) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.4 and Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system).
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.4 · Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system)
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 50W
Common questions
Which is better: Nothing Phone (3a) or Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Nothing Phone (3a) leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) (73.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.4 and Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system).
What are the main battery and display differences between Nothing Phone (3a) and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Nothing Phone (3a) has a 6.77-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do Nothing Phone (3a) and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) compare for speed?
Nothing Phone (3a) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Nothing Phone (2a) vs Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3) vs Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB A059P (Nothing Asteroids Plus) vs Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a) vs Galaxy A36
Nothing Phone (3a) vs Galaxy A35 5G
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 5G
POCO X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
POCO X6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →