OnePlus 8T vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oneplus · 2020

OnePlus 8T

OnePlus 8T
83/ 100
Launch price$749
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T
2 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
OnePlus 8TXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedOnePlus 8T
    90
    70
  • CameraOnePlus 8T
    82
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    80
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    86
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    68
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger screen10.1" vs 6.55"
  • OnePlus 8T has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy OnePlus 8T
  • ✓48 MP main camera
  • ✓6.55" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+2,100 mAh)
  • ✓10.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOnePlus 8TXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen typeFluid AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.55"10.1"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (402 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1,100 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 OnePlus 8T Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 OnePlus 8T Wins Camera
Primary Camera48 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony IMX586undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera16 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.45undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mmN/A
Weight188 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging65W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Not listed
Bluetooth5.1Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.1Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$749Price on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins — BeastScore 82.6/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 6.55"). The OnePlus 8T is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Buy OnePlus 8T if you want

More RAM: 12 GB vs 6 GB

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh · Larger display: 10.1" vs 6.55"

Common questions

Which is better: OnePlus 8T or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 6.55"). The OnePlus 8T is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). BeastScore: OnePlus 8T 83.0/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between OnePlus 8T and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

OnePlus 8T has a 6.55-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do OnePlus 8T and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE compare for speed?

OnePlus 8T scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →