Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Oppo Find X9 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oppo · 2026

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
92/ 100
Launch price$1,740
Samsung · 2025

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
92/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Oppo Find X9 Ultra wins 5 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
5 wins
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivity
Oppo Find X9 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • SpeedOppo Find X9 Ultra
    95
    75
  • Camerafrom specsOppo Find X9 Ultra
    100
    82
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieOppo Find X9 Ultra
    100
    88
  • BatteryOppo Find X9 Ultra
    100
    46
  • Displayfrom specsTie
    92
    92
  • ConnectivityOppo Find X9 Ultra
    100
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has the bigger battery7,050 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has the bigger screen6.82" vs 6.7"
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is lighter187 g vs 232 g
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Oppo Find X9 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Exynos 2400
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo Find X9 Ultra
  • ✓Bigger 7,050 mAh battery (+3,050 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.82" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
  • ✓45 g lighter (187 g vs 232 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOppo Find X9 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeLTPO AMOLEDColor Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (16M Colors)
Screen Size6.82"6.7"
Resolution & Density3168x1440 (510 ppi)~ 426 PPI
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz adaptive
Brightness3,600 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Oppo Find X9 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)Exynos 2400
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 840Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 15 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512GB / 1024GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Oppo Find X9 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.5, OIS, Hasselblad 1/1.12-inch50 MP, 50MP Main (OIS) + 50MP Ultra-wide + Telephoto
Telephoto Zoom50 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens50 MP, f/232 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163 x 77 x 8.8 mmN/A
Weight232 g187 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP69Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Find X9 Ultra Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,050 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging100W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless Charging50W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Yes, with wifi-hotspot
Bluetooth6.0Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2Yes, USB-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,740Price on request
Our verdict

Oppo Find X9 Ultra wins — BeastScore 92.2/100

The Oppo Find X9 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,050 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (187 g vs 232 g).

Buy Oppo Find X9 Ultra if you want

Larger battery: 7,050 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G if you want

Lighter: 187 g vs 232 g (45 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Oppo Find X9 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G?

The Oppo Find X9 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,050 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (187 g vs 232 g). BeastScore: Oppo Find X9 Ultra 92.2/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G 92.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G?

Oppo Find X9 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display and 7050 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G compare for speed?

Oppo Find X9 Ultra scores 95/100 for performance; Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G scores 75/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Oppo Find X9 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →