Home/Battles/Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Philips · 2016
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2022
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIMWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Philips Xenium | Samsung SM-G736U1 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5" | 6.58" | 6.58" |
| Chassis Weight | 189g | 240g | 189g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM:
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+950 mAh more)
When to buy Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
Significantly larger display: 6.58" vs max 5" for media & multitasking · More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 1GB
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Which phone is better: Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+950 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM is equipped with a 5-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Score: 66/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Score: 66/100
Google · 2022
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Score: 66/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Score: 67/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Score: 66/100
Vivo · 2022
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Score: 66/100
Oppo · 2022
A17k
Score: 66/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #166 vs 66
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
V/S
Battle #266 vs 66
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
V/S
Battle #366 vs 66
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #466 vs 66
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #566 vs 66
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #666 vs 66
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #766 vs 67
Philips Xenium V526 LTE Dual SIM vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S
Battle #866 vs 67
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S