Pixel 4 vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Pixel 4 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Pixel 4 | Samsung SM-S731U | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 60Hz | 90Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 2,800 mAh | 4,900 mAh | +4,900 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 18W | Standard | 25W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5.7" | 6.74" | 6.74" |
| Chassis Weight | 162g | 190g | 162g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Pixel 4 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 70.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Pixel 4 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Pixel 4 vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Which is better: Pixel 4 or Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Pixel 4 leads with an overall BeastScore of 70.0/100 compared to Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 70.0 vs top rival 69.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Pixel 4 and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Pixel 4 is equipped with a 5.7-inch display and 2800 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) features a 6.74-inch display and 4900 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Pixel 4 and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Pixel 4 achieves a 72/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

OnePlus Ace 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PGKM10 (BBK Pickle)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 21121210G (Xiaomi Ingres)

BBK Vivo X90s 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2241HA (BBK V2241HA)

Oppo Reno8 T 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 BD KH 128GB CPH2505 (BBK 2505)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones Battles
Pixel 4 vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
Pixel 4 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Pixel 4 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Pixel 4 vs OnePlus Ace 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PGKM10 (BBK Pickle)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs OnePlus Ace 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PGKM10 (BBK Pickle)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
