Pixel 6a vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 70.7/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Pixel 6a
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)
Pixel 6a wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)7290
- CameraPixel 6a7260
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie7070
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValuePixel 6a8068
- Pixel 6a has the bigger battery4,410 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the bigger screen6.49" vs 6.1"
- Pixel 6a is lighter178 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) wins — BeastScore 70.7/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 70.7 vs top rival 70.4 and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB.
Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
Higher overall BeastScore: 70.7 vs top rival 70.4 · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB
Common questions
Which is better: Pixel 6a or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) leads with an overall BeastScore of 70.7/100 compared to Pixel 6a (70.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 70.7 vs top rival 70.4 and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB.
What are the main battery and display differences between Pixel 6a and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
Pixel 6a has a 6.1-inch display and 4410 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do Pixel 6a and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
Pixel 6a scores 72/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Pixel 6a vs Pixel 8a
Pixel 6a vs Pixel 7a
Pixel 5a vs Pixel 6a
Pixel 6a vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Pixel 6a vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Flagship Camera ShootoutiPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
Read →