BeastCompare

POCO F5 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Poco · 2023

POCO F5

POCO F5
85/ 100
Launch price$379
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

POCO F5
POCO F5
2 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
POCO F5Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedPOCO F5
    80
    79
  • CameraPOCO F5
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
    88
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
    86
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
    80
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger screen11" vs 6.67"
  • POCO F5 has the faster chipSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 vs Helio G100
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy POCO F5
  • ✓64 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
  • ✓Bigger 8,800 mAh battery (+3,800 mAh)
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationPOCO F5Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeFlow AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.67"11"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (395 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 POCO F5 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Helio G100
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 725Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 POCO F5 Wins Camera
Primary Camera64 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX686undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.5undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mmN/A
Weight181 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP53Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh8,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging67W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Not listed
Bluetooth5.3Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$379Price on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins — BeastScore 85.3/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.67"). The POCO F5 is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 vs Helio G100).

Buy POCO F5 if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.67"

Common questions

Which is better: POCO F5 or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.67"). The POCO F5 is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 vs Helio G100). BeastScore: POCO F5 84.8/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro 85.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between POCO F5 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?

POCO F5 has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.

How do POCO F5 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro compare for speed?

POCO F5 scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A57 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A57 5G

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
Vivo

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro

Oppo A5 Energy
Oppo

Oppo A5 Energy

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

POCO F5 vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO F5 vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Compare →
vs

POCO F5 vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO F5 vs OnePlus Nord CE5 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE5 5G

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)Flagship SSD Shootout
15 min read

Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)

We compare and dissect the 2026 flagship NVMe SSD landscape: 12nm Phison PS5026-E26 vs. 8nm Samsung Pascal S4LV008 vs. WD 20-82-20035-B1 controllers, Micron 232-layer vs. Samsung V-NAND V7 TLC, 14,500 MB/s sequential speeds, DirectStorage 1.2 GPU decompression, sustained pSLC write cache endurance, active heatsink thermal dynamics, and real-world gaming IOPS.

Read →