BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/POCO F6 vs vivo Y31t 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

POCO F6 vs vivo Y31t 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Xiaomi ยท 2024

POCO F6

POCO F6
88/ 100
Launch MSRP$449 USD
Vivo

vivo Y31t 5G

vivo Y31t 5G
88/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo Y31t 5G BETTER THAN POCO F6?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

POCO F6
vivo Y31t 5GWinner ๐Ÿ†

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORPOCO F6vivo Y31tLEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh7,200 mAh+7,200 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90WStandard90W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"6.75"6.75"
Chassis Weight179gN/A179g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy POCO F6:
  • โœ“820g lighter chassis (179g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“$9550 lower launch MSRP ($449 vs $9999)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy vivo Y31t 5G:
  • โœ“Larger 7,200 mAh battery capacity (+2,200 mAh more capacity)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.75" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
SpecificationPOCO F6vivo Y31t 5G
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† vivo Y31t 5G Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.67"6.75"
Resolution & Density2712x1220 (446 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness2,400 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† vivo Y31t 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† POCO F6 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, Sony LYT-60050 MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens20 MP, f/2.212 MP
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† POCO F6 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions160.5 x 74 x 8 mmN/A
Weight179 gN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP64Not certified
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† vivo Y31t 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh7,200 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth5.4Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$449Price on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo Y31t 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo Y31t 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose POCO F6:
Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W ยท Brighter screen: 2,400 nits peak vs 0 nits
When to choose vivo Y31t 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 88.1 vs top rival 87.7 ยท Larger battery capacity: 7,200 mAh (+2,200 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: POCO F6 vs vivo Y31t 5G

Which is better: POCO F6 or vivo Y31t 5G?

vivo Y31t 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 88.1/100 compared to POCO F6 (87.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 88.1 vs top rival 87.7 and Larger battery capacity: 7,200 mAh (+2,200 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between POCO F6 and vivo Y31t 5G?

POCO F6 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while vivo Y31t 5G features a 6.75-inch display and 7200 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between POCO F6 and vivo Y31t 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, POCO F6 achieves a 90/100 performance score, while vivo Y31t 5G scores 91/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis โ†’
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’