BeastCompare

POCO F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

POCO F7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 90.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Poco · 2025

POCO F7 Pro

POCO F7 Pro
90/ 100
Launch price$549
Xiaomi · 2025

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
89/ 100
Launch price$549
Head-to-head

POCO F7 Pro wins 3 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

POCO F7 Pro
POCO F7 Pro
3 wins
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
POCO F7 ProXiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Poco F7 Pro
    90
    95
  • CameraPOCO F7 Pro
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    76
    76
  • BatteryPOCO F7 Pro
    98
    95
  • DisplayPOCO F7 Pro
    90
    84
  • ConnectivityTie
    83
    83
  • SecurityTie
    100
    100
  • ValueXiaomi Poco F7 Pro
    80
    85

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy POCO F7 Pro
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationPOCO F7 ProXiaomi Poco F7 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 POCO F7 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeLTPO AMOLED CrystalResLTPO AMOLED CrystalRes
Screen Size6.67"6.67"
Resolution & Density3200x1440 (526 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (526 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness3,200 nits peak3,200 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 (4nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 750Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 POCO F7 Pro Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony IMX90650 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony IMX906
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.28 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens20 MP, f/2.220 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions160.3 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm160.3 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm
Weight207 g207 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 POCO F7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$549$549
Our verdict

POCO F7 Pro wins — BeastScore 90.1/100

After comparing all the specs, POCO F7 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 90.1 vs top rival 88.6.

Buy POCO F7 Pro if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 90.1 vs top rival 88.6

Buy Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you want

Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Common questions

Which is better: POCO F7 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?

POCO F7 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 90.1/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (88.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 90.1 vs top rival 88.6.

What are the main battery and display differences between POCO F7 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?

POCO F7 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do POCO F7 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro compare for speed?

POCO F7 Pro scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G

Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Apple

Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Oneplus

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

vivo IQOO Pad5c
Vivo

vivo IQOO Pad5c

Oppo Find N6 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find N6 5G

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

POCO F7 Pro vs POCO F7 Ultra

Compare →
vs

POCO F7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO F7 Pro vs OnePlus 13R

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →