Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?
Vivo X300 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra wins 6 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedVivo X300 Ultra9095
- CameraVivo X300 Ultra99100
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieVivo X300 Ultra60100
- BatteryVivo X300 Ultra90100
- DisplayVivo X300 Ultra8890
- ConnectivityVivo X300 Ultra75100
- SecurityTie100100
- ValueRedmi Note 13 Pro+8055
- Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Redmi Note 13 Pro+ charges faster120W vs 100W
- Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger screen6.82" vs 6.67"
- Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is lighter204.5 g vs 235 g
- Redmi Note 13 Pro+ launched cheaper$399 vs $1,992
- Vivo X300 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP
- Vivo X300 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.3
- Vivo X300 Ultra has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Vivo X300 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Vivo X300 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- Vivo X300 Ultra is better protected from water and dustIP69 vs IP68
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Vivo X300 Ultra wins — BeastScore 92.2/100
The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.82" vs 6.67"). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (120W vs 100W).
Faster wired charging: 120W vs 100W · Lighter: 204.5 g vs 235 g (31 g less)
Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)
Common questions
Which is better: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.82" vs 6.67"). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (120W vs 100W). BeastScore: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 90.8/100, Vivo X300 Ultra 92.2/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra?
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.
How do Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra compare for speed?
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ scores 90/100 for performance; Vivo X300 Ultra scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (China)
Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+
vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo X300s
Gear for the Vivo X300 Ultra
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Tech NewsiPhone Duo vs vivo X Fold6: Two $2,000 Foldables, One Busy Week
vivo took the X Fold6 global on October 1, and Apple set iPhone Duo pre-orders for October 16 with a "Get Ready" step starting October 12. We put the official specs side by side so you know which foldable fits you before you spend $2,000.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →