Home/Battles/s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Galaxy Folder2

Lab Benchmark Battle

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Galaxy Folder2

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Verykool · 2018

s5037 Apollo Quattro

63/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Samsung · 2017

Galaxy Folder2

61/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS s5037 Apollo Quattro BETTER THAN Galaxy Folder2?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

s5037 Apollo QuattroWinner 🏆

Galaxy Folder2

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	s5037 Apollo	Galaxy Folder2	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	2,000 mAh	1,950 mAh	+2,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	13 MP	8 MP	13 MP
Screen Display Size	5"	3.8"	5"
Chassis Weight	163g	165g	163g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy s5037 Apollo Quattro:

✓2g lighter chassis (163g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓Larger 2,000 mAh battery capacity (+50 mAh more capacity)
✓13MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

Reasons to buy Galaxy Folder2:

✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	s5037 Apollo Quattro	Galaxy Folder2
1. Display & Screen🏆 s5037 Apollo Quattro Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors	TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Screen Size	5"	3.8"
Resolution & Density	480x854 (196 ppi)	480x800 (246 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz ProMotion	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 s5037 Apollo Quattro Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	1 GB LPDDR	2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	1GB / 8GB	2GB / 16GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 s5037 Apollo Quattro Wins Camera
Primary Camera	13 MP	8 MP
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	5 MP	5 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 s5037 Apollo Quattro Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	163 g	165 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 s5037 Apollo Quattro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	2,000 mAh	1,950 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, WiFi Direct, hotspot
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP, LE	4.2, A2DP, LE
USB Port & Speed	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

s5037 Apollo Quattro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 62.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, s5037 Apollo Quattro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.

When to buy s5037 Apollo Quattro:

Higher overall BeastScore: 62.8 vs top rival 60.8 · Significantly larger display: 5" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking

When to buy Galaxy Folder2:

Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Galaxy Folder2

Which phone is better: s5037 Apollo Quattro or Galaxy Folder2?

s5037 Apollo Quattro leads with an overall BeastScore of 62.8/100 compared to Galaxy Folder2 (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 62.8 vs top rival 60.8 and Significantly larger display: 5" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between s5037 Apollo Quattro and Galaxy Folder2?

s5037 Apollo Quattro is equipped with a 5-inch display and 2000 mAh battery, while Galaxy Folder2 features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between s5037 Apollo Quattro and Galaxy Folder2?

In lab hardware evaluations, s5037 Apollo Quattro scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

V/S

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Compare Both Phones→

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Galaxy Folder2

s5037 Apollo Quattro

Galaxy Folder2

WHY IS s5037 Apollo Quattro BETTER THAN Galaxy Folder2?

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

s5037 Apollo Quattro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 62.8/100

Frequently Asked Questions: s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Galaxy Folder2

Which phone is better: s5037 Apollo Quattro or Galaxy Folder2?

What are the primary battery and display differences between s5037 Apollo Quattro and Galaxy Folder2?

How do the camera capabilities compare between s5037 Apollo Quattro and Galaxy Folder2?

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Galaxy Folder2 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Galaxy Folder2 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Galaxy Folder2 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

s5037 Apollo Quattro vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Galaxy Folder2 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)