Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) BETTER THAN SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung Galaxy | SM-F916N Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | 25W | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50 MP | 12.2 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.6" | 6.22" | 6.6" |
| Chassis Weight | N/A | 282g | 282g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its MT6769V architecture and verified 80/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB
Which phone is better: Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) or SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.3/100 compared to SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (79.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.3 vs top rival 79.1 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) and SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) is equipped with a 6.6-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB features a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) and SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) scores 80/100 in camera performance, while SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB scores 68/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

Apple iPad (2025)
Pixel 8a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)

vivo T3 Lite

A80

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q


Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Apple iPad (2025)


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Apple iPad (2025)


Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Pixel 8a

SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Pixel 8a

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE

