BeastCompare

Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Samsung Galaxy F36 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2025

Samsung Galaxy F16

Samsung Galaxy F16
86/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Samsung · 2025

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
86/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G wins 3 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Samsung Galaxy F16
Samsung Galaxy F16
0 wins
Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivity
Samsung Galaxy F16Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • Speedfrom specsSamsung Galaxy F36 5G
    57
    63
  • Camerafrom specsTie
    32
    32
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    60
    60
  • BatterySamsung Galaxy F36 5G
    39
    57
  • DisplaySamsung Galaxy F36 5G
    39
    49
  • ConnectivityTie
    65
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • Samsung Galaxy F16 is lighter191 g vs 197 g
  • Samsung Galaxy F36 5G has the faster chipExynos 1380 vs Dimensity 6300
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy F16
  • ✓6 g lighter (191 g vs 197 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Galaxy F16Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung Galaxy F36 5G Wins Display
Screen typeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen Size6.7"6.7"
Resolution & Density1080 x 2340 (385 ppi)1080 x 2340 (385 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung Galaxy F36 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 6300 Exynos 1380
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15 15Android 15 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera50 MP, 50MP Main + Depth Sensor50 MP, 50MP Main + Depth Sensor
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP16 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung Galaxy F16 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight191 g197 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP54Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung Galaxy F36 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast charging25W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.3v5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G wins — BeastScore 86.0/100

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster chip (Exynos 1380 vs Dimensity 6300). The Samsung Galaxy F16 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (191 g vs 197 g).

Buy Samsung Galaxy F16 if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy Samsung Galaxy F36 5G if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Upgrade guideOwn the Samsung Galaxy F16? Is upgrading to the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G worth it?
Read the verdict →

Common questions

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy F16 or Samsung Galaxy F36 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster chip (Exynos 1380 vs Dimensity 6300). The Samsung Galaxy F16 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (191 g vs 197 g). BeastScore: Samsung Galaxy F16 86.0/100, Samsung Galaxy F36 5G 86.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy F16 and Samsung Galaxy F36 5G?

Samsung Galaxy F16 has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy F36 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G

Apple iPhone 17e
Apple

Apple iPhone 17e

Pixel 10 Pro
Google

Pixel 10 Pro

OnePlus N6 Lite
Oneplus

OnePlus N6 Lite

Xiaomi 17T 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17T 5G

vivo Y11d
Vivo

vivo Y11d

OPPO Reno15 F
Oppo

OPPO Reno15 F

Motorola Signature 5G
Motorola

Motorola Signature 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Samsung Galaxy F07 vs Samsung Galaxy F16

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Samsung Galaxy F16

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Samsung Galaxy F17 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Xiaomi Redmi A7

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Xiaomi 17T 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F36 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy F36 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F56 5G

Compare →
vs

Huawei nova 15 Max vs Samsung Galaxy F36 5G

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read →
Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
16 min read

Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)

We compare Apple's 3nm Tandem OLED powerhouse, Samsung's 14.6-inch Dimensity 9300+ anti-reflective slate, and Microsoft's Snapdragon X Elite Copilot+ PC across Geekbench 6, Cinebench 2024, stylus latency, thermal throttling, battery life, and real-world desktop multitasking.

Read →