Home/Battles/Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2020
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo · 2023
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) BETTER THAN Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top)Winner 🏆
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-F916N | Oppo Reno10 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh | +4,600 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 6.7" | 6.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | 186g | 186g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top):
Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to buy Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525):
Lighter body: 186g (96g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Which phone is better: Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) or Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) (72.3/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) and Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) features a 6.7-inch display and 4600 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) and Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Score: 72/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2023
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Score: 72/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
Score: 72/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo S17 Pro 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2284A (BBK V2284A)
Score: 72/100
Oppo · 2023
Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Score: 72/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #172 vs 72
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #272 vs 72
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #372 vs 70
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #472 vs 70
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #572 vs 72
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #672 vs 72
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #772 vs 73
Samsung SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (Samsung Top) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #872 vs 73
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S