Home/Battles/Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Samsung · 2022

Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4)

71/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

71/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Samsung SM-F936U	Oppo Reno11	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	4,400 mAh	5,000 mAh	+5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	N/A	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	6.19"	6.7"	6.7"
Chassis Weight	263g	177g	177g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4):

✓6.19" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

Reasons to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):

✓86g lighter chassis (177g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓Larger 5,000 mAh battery capacity (+600 mAh more capacity)
✓6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4)	Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	AM-OLED display	AM-OLED display
Screen Size	6.19"	6.7"
Resolution & Density	904x2316 (401 ppi)	1080x2412 (394 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	12 GB LPDDR	8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	256GB	256GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) Wins Camera
Primary Camera	N/A	N/A
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	N/A	N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	263 g	177 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	4,400 mAh	5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3+	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4):

More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB

When to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):

Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more)

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Which phone is better: Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) or Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) is equipped with a 6.19-inch display and 4400 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) features a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung SM-F936U Galaxy Z Fold4 5G UW TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F936T (Samsung Q4) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier