Home/Battles/Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2023
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5)Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-F9460 | Samsung SM-F966D | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 4,400 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.19" | 6.49" | 6.49" |
| Chassis Weight | 253g | 215g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 70.7/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5):
Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to buy Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7):
Lighter body: 215g (38g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Which phone is better: Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) or Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) leads with an overall BeastScore of 70.7/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) is equipped with a 6.19-inch display and 4400 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Score: 71/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2025
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Score: 71/100
Oneplus · 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Score: 71/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Score: 71/100
Vivo · 2024
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Score: 71/100
Oppo · 2024
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Score: 71/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #171 vs 71
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #271 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #371 vs 70
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #471 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #571 vs 71
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #671 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #771 vs 71
Samsung SM-F9460 Galaxy Z Fold5 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 256GB (Samsung Q5) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S
Battle #871 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S