BeastCompare - Independent Smartphone Battles & Specifications
Home/Battles/Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo · 2023

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung SM-F966JOppo Reno10LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,400 mAh4,600 mAh+4,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size6.49"6.7"6.7"
Chassis Weight215g186g186g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7):
  • 6.49" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525):
  • 29g lighter chassis (186g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,600 mAh battery capacity (+200 mAh more capacity)
  • 6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAM-OLED displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.49"6.7"
Resolution & Density1080x2520 (423 ppi)1080x2412 (394 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1000GB256GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight215 g186 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,400 mAh4,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7):
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
When to buy Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525):
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+200 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)

Which phone is better: Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) or Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+200 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) and Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) is equipped with a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) features a 6.7-inch display and 4600 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) and Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)?

In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) scores 60/100.

Trending Matchups

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

Battle #172 vs 72

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #272 vs 72

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
V/S
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #372 vs 70

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #472 vs 70

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
V/S
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #572 vs 72

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #672 vs 72

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
V/S
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #772 vs 73

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
V/S
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #872 vs 73

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
V/S
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Compare Both Phones