Home/Battles/Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Google · 2023
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)Winner 🏆
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-F966N | Google Pixel | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 4,821 mAh | +4,821 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.49" | 7.57" | 7.57" |
| Chassis Weight | 215g | 283g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7):
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB · Lighter body: 215g (68g lighter in hand)
When to buy Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix):
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+421 mAh more)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Which phone is better: Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) or Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+421 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) is equipped with a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery, while Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) features a 7.57-inch display and 4821 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Score: 72/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2023
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Score: 72/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
Score: 72/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo S17 Pro 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2284A (BBK V2284A)
Score: 72/100
Oppo · 2023
Oppo Reno10 Pro 5G 2023 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB CPH2525 (BBK 2525)
Score: 72/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #172 vs 72
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #272 vs 72
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
V/S
Battle #372 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #472 vs 70
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #572 vs 72
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #672 vs 72
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
V/S
Battle #772 vs 73
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #872 vs 73
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S