Home/Battles/SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Lab Benchmark Battle
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2019
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB BETTER THAN Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GBWinner 🏆
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F900F Galaxy | Apple iPhone | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,380 mAh | 4,685 mAh | +4,685 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 4.58" | 6.86" | 6.86" |
| Chassis Weight | 276g | 227g | 227g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.7/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
When to buy SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB:
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.7 vs top rival 69.8 · Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP
When to buy Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2):
Larger battery capacity: 4,685 mAh (+305 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 6.86" vs max 4.58" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Which phone is better: SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB or Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)?
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.7/100 compared to Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.7 vs top rival 69.8 and Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP.
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)?
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB is equipped with a 4.58-inch display and 4380 mAh battery, while Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) features a 6.86-inch display and 4685 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2024
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Score: 73/100
Apple · 2026
iPhone 17e
Score: 75/100
Google · 2024
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
Score: 73/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Poco X7 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 24095PCADI (Xiaomi Malachite C)
Score: 73/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
Score: 73/100
Oppo · 2025
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Score: 73/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #173 vs 73
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
V/S
Battle #270 vs 70
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
V/S
Battle #373 vs 75
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs iPhone 17e
V/S
Battle #470 vs 70
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus UW 5G A3081 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,4)
V/S
Battle #573 vs 73
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
V/S
Battle #670 vs 71
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #773 vs 73
SM-F900F Galaxy Fold Global TD-LTE 512GB vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #870 vs 70
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
V/S
