Home/Battles/SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Lab Benchmark Battle
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2019
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
71/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,980 USD
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GBWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F900U Galaxy | Samsung SM-F966Z | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,380 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +4,400 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 4.58" | 6.49" | 6.49" |
| Chassis Weight | 276g | 215g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
When to buy SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB:
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP
When to buy Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7):
Significantly larger display: 6.49" vs max 4.58" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 215g (61g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Which phone is better: SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB or Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP.
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB is equipped with a 4.58-inch display and 4380 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Score: 71/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2025
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Score: 71/100
Oneplus · 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Score: 71/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Score: 71/100
Vivo · 2024
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Score: 71/100
Oppo · 2024
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Score: 71/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #171 vs 71
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #271 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #371 vs 70
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #471 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #571 vs 71
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #671 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #771 vs 71
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S
Battle #871 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S