Home/Battles/SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Lab Benchmark Battle
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2019
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo · 2025
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB BETTER THAN Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GBWinner 🏆
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F907N Galaxy | Oppo Reno13 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,234 mAh | 5,800 mAh | +5,800 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 4.58" | 6.67" | 6.67" |
| Chassis Weight | 276g | 192g | 192g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.7/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
When to buy SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB:
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.7 vs top rival 72.6 · Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP
When to buy Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699):
Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+1,566 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 6.67" vs max 4.58" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Which phone is better: SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB or Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.7/100 compared to Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.7 vs top rival 72.6 and Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP.
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB and Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB is equipped with a 4.58-inch display and 4234 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) features a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB and Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2024
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Score: 73/100
Apple · 2026
iPhone 17e
Score: 75/100
Google · 2024
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
Score: 73/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Poco X7 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 24095PCADI (Xiaomi Malachite C)
Score: 73/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
Score: 73/100
Oppo · 2025
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Score: 73/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #173 vs 73
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
V/S
Battle #273 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
V/S
Battle #373 vs 75
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs iPhone 17e
V/S
Battle #473 vs 75
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs iPhone 17e
V/S
Battle #573 vs 73
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
V/S
Battle #673 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
V/S
Battle #773 vs 73
SM-F907N Galaxy Fold 5G TD-LTE KR 512GB vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #873 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S