SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Google Pixel Fold
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS Google Pixel Fold BETTER THAN SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F916J Galaxy | Google Pixel | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,821 mAh | +4,821 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | 30W | 30W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 7.6" | 7.6" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | 283g | 282g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Google Pixel Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 85/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Google Pixel Fold
Which phone is better: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q or Google Pixel Fold?
Google Pixel Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.0/100 compared to SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q (79.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 79.1 and Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+321 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and Google Pixel Fold?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Google Pixel Fold features a 7.6-inch display and 4821 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and Google Pixel Fold?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Google Pixel Fold scores 85/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

Apple iPad (2025)
Pixel 8a

OnePlus N6x

Xiaomi Poco C85x 5G

vivo T5 Lite 5G

Oppo A6k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


Google Pixel Fold vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Apple iPad (2025)


Google Pixel Fold vs Apple iPad (2025)

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Pixel 8a

Google Pixel Fold vs Pixel 8a
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE


Google Pixel Fold vs OnePlus N6x
