SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q BETTER THAN SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F916J Galaxy | SM-F916N Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | 25W | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 12.2 MP | 12.2 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 6.22" | 6.22" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | 282g | 282g |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.1/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB
Which phone is better: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q or SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.1/100 compared to SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB (79.1/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB features a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 68/100 in camera performance, while SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB scores 68/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

Apple iPad (2025)
Pixel 8a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)

vivo T3 Lite

A80

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Apple iPad (2025)


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Apple iPad (2025)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Pixel 8a

SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Pixel 8a

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE


SM-F916N Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE KR 256GB vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE

