SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) BETTER THAN SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F916J Galaxy | Xiaomi Poco | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 6.58" | 6.58" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | N/A | 282g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its Dimensity 700 architecture and verified 80/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)
Which phone is better: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q or Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)?
Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.3/100 compared to SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q (79.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.3 vs top rival 79.1 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) features a 6.58-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

Apple iPad (2025)
Pixel 8a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M5 (India)

vivo T3 Lite

A80

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Apple iPad (2025)


Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) vs Apple iPad (2025)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Pixel 8a

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) vs Pixel 8a

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE


Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE

