SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs Reno11 Pro
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS Reno11 Pro BETTER THAN SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F916U Galaxy | Reno11 Pro | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh | +4,600 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 6.74" | 6.74" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | 190g | 190g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Reno11 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 78.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Reno11 Pro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 84/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs Reno11 Pro
Which phone is better: SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 or Reno11 Pro?
Reno11 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 78.3/100 compared to SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 (77.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 78.3 vs top rival 77.8 and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 12.2 MP.
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 and Reno11 Pro?
SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Reno11 Pro features a 6.74-inch display and 4600 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 and Reno11 Pro?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Reno11 Pro scores 84/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022

Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY

T2 Series

A80

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


Reno11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


Reno11 Pro vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

Reno11 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

SM-F916U Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE US 256GB / SM-F916R4 vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)


Reno11 Pro vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE

