SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB BETTER THAN SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F916W Galaxy | SM-F9260 Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,335 mAh | +4,500 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | 25W | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 12.2 MP | 12.2 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.22" | 6.23" | 6.23" |
| Chassis Weight | 282g | 271g | 271g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB
Which phone is better: SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB or SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB?
SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 77.8/100 compared to SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (77.5/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 77.8 vs top rival 77.5 and Lower launch price: $2320 (save $Infinity).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB and SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB?
SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB is equipped with a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB features a 6.23-inch display and 4335 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB and SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB scores 68/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022

Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY

T2 Series

Reno11 Pro

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

SM-F916W Galaxy Z Fold2 5G TD-LTE CA 256GB vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)


SM-F9260 Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Thom Browne Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

