SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs iPhone 17e
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B BETTER THAN iPhone 17e?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F926D Galaxy | iPhone 17e | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,335 mAh | 4,005 mAh | +4,335 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | 30W | 30W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12 MP | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.23" | 6.1" | 6.23" |
| Chassis Weight | 272g | 169g | 169g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.5/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs iPhone 17e
Which phone is better: SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B or iPhone 17e?
SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B leads with an overall BeastScore of 77.5/100 compared to iPhone 17e (74.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 77.5 vs top rival 74.9 and Larger battery capacity: 4,335 mAh (+330 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B and iPhone 17e?
SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B is equipped with a 6.23-inch display and 4335 mAh battery, while iPhone 17e features a 6.1-inch display and 4005 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B and iPhone 17e?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B scores 68/100 in camera performance, while iPhone 17e scores 82/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022

Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)

T2 Series

Reno11 Pro

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


iPhone 17e vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)


SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


iPhone 17e vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

iPhone 17e vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

SM-F926D Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB SC-55B vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)


iPhone 17e vs OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

