SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB BETTER THAN Apple iPhone SE (2022)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-F926N Galaxy | Apple iPhone | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,335 mAh | 2,018 mAh | +4,335 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 25W | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12.2 MP | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.23" | 4.7" | 6.23" |
| Chassis Weight | 271g | N/A | 271g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.5/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Which phone is better: SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB or Apple iPhone SE (2022)?
SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 77.5/100 compared to Apple iPhone SE (2022) (77.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 77.5 vs top rival 77.1 and Larger battery capacity: 4,335 mAh (+2,317 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB and Apple iPhone SE (2022)?
SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB is equipped with a 6.23-inch display and 4335 mAh battery, while Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a 4.7-inch display and 2018 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB and Apple iPhone SE (2022)?
In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Apple iPhone SE (2022) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022

iPhone 17e
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)

T2 Series

Reno11 Pro

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022


Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB


SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs iPhone 17e


Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs iPhone 17e


SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

SM-F926N Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE KR 256GB vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)


Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

