Home/Battles/SRS-3300 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Lab Benchmark Battle

SRS-3300 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Sewon · 2005

SRS-3300

61/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

61/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS SRS-3300 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

SRS-3300Winner 🏆

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	SRS-3300	Samsung SM-G1600	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	720 mAh	1,950 mAh	+1,950 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	N/A	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	N/A	3.8"	6.1"
Chassis Weight	90g	160g	90g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy SRS-3300:

✓70g lighter chassis (90g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics

Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):

✓Larger 1,950 mAh battery capacity (+1,230 mAh more capacity)
✓3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	SRS-3300	Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
1. Display & Screen🏆 SRS-3300 Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	TFT, 256K colors	Color TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size	N/A	3.8"
Resolution & Density	128x160	480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz ProMotion	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 SRS-3300 Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Feature phone	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	1 GB LPDDR	2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	N/A	16GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 SRS-3300 Wins Camera
Primary Camera	N/A	N/A
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	N/A	N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 SRS-3300 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	90 g	160 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 SRS-3300 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	720 mAh	1,950 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3+	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

SRS-3300 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SRS-3300 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy SRS-3300:

Lighter body: 90g (70g lighter in hand)

When to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):

Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+1,230 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 3.8" vs max 0" for media & multitasking

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: SRS-3300 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which phone is better: SRS-3300 or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

SRS-3300 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Lighter body: 90g (70g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between SRS-3300 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

SRS-3300 is equipped with a display and 720 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between SRS-3300 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

In lab hardware evaluations, SRS-3300 scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

V/S

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Compare Both Phones→

SRS-3300 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

SRS-3300

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

WHY IS SRS-3300 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

SRS-3300 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

Frequently Asked Questions: SRS-3300 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which phone is better: SRS-3300 or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

What are the primary battery and display differences between SRS-3300 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

How do the camera capabilities compare between SRS-3300 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

SRS-3300 vs Galaxy Folder2

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2

SRS-3300 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

SRS-3300 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

SRS-3300 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)